Archive for February, 2008

Random goodies on the web this week – Feb 20 2008

Friday, February 22nd, 2008

There are several interesting things to read about online this week. Here’s some links.

Ebay sellers are furious about changes ebay is making, and there is a discussion at digg worth reading. I have a friend who has been working on n anti-ebay web site, it’s still in the making, but will appear online at www.postwhatyouwant.com in due time.

Following the discussion at digg i learned of a web site that hopes to bridge the gap of reputation between various web sites – vbuddy.

Somehow I stumbled upon Ziki.com, from their web site:

What is Ziki.com?

Ziki is a free way to search for comprehensive information about a person based on published information available on the Web.

An estimated 30 percent of Internet research relates to people searches. “To Google someone” has become a part of everyday language for most Americans, and with the explosion of social networks and publication platforms (blogs, photo sharing sites, video sharing sites, etc), Internet users have scattered across the Web a mine of personal information. Since this information is searched on a regular basis , there is a need to organize and present it in a structured way.

Edicionsub is back online after losing it’s domain and web site content. Another lesson in backing up.

Cool diffuser idea for LED – use a  ping pong ball. It kind of looks like retro Christmas lights. (Found at Boing Boing)

ping pong ball led

Rip a sim card from a cell phone to your computer – cool. And there may be a way to do it for under $20.

using a game to teach people about journalism – cool idea.

Link me up adds an easy way for others to add links to your blog. 

blgads looks a lot like a google adwords type of a thing.

Private eye defends integrity of “honey trapping”

Thursday, February 21st, 2008

Private eye defends integrity of “honey trapping”By Kate Kelland Wed Feb 13, 1:20 PM ET

From yahoo news / Reuters

LONDON (Reuters) – When Richard Martinez goes to a nightclub or bar, he often goes alone.

But the 38-year-old former RAF officer wastes no time in heading for a target — a woman — to flirt with and flatter.

Martinez will not try too hard, but will allow himself to be drawn into conversation and, if asked, will give out his phone number for a potential future date.

Martinez is a “honey trapper” — or as he likes to call himself, an “integrity tester” — one of a growing team of private detectives who are hired by wives, husbands or partners to test the loyalty of their loved ones.

“It’s growing all the time,” he says of his business, the Expedite Detective Agency (www.ex-da.com), which charges 300 pounds ($588) for an integrity test on a potential cheat.

Martinez refutes accusations of marriage-wrecking, arguing that his customers come to him when they are already concerned about their partner’s fidelity or when rumors have led them to suspect an affair. But he admits around 80 percent of targets fail the test and turn out to be ready and willing to cheat on a partner.

Martinez and his colleagues — he has a team of male and female trappers, some more, some less attractive — record the whole “hit” on audio and video, so that the customer can see for themselves how the evening develops.

And Martinez has “rules of engagement”: The target must not be drunk, there must be no touching, and the relative attractiveness of the trapper to the target must be equal.

“It’s got to be a fair test,” he explains. “So we make sure that we don’t set a very attractive honey trapper on a not so attractive target, and vice versa.”

“The customer needs a fair answer to the question of whether their husband or girlfriend is loyal.”

Martinez says that while many of his customers may end their relationships, other use the honey trap to confront unfaithful lovers and appeal to them to change their ways.

“So we can also act as a deterrent,” he says. “The customer can say to their partner: ‘I caught you this time and I want you to change’ and they can warn that they will use the honey trap service in the future to test them again.”

He shrugs off criticism that he is fostering mistrust, and insists he is meeting a real need among British couples. But while Martinez is unashamed about what he does, other such detective agencies are more reticent.

At UK Honey Traps, a service based in Worcestershire in the heart of England and offering trappers across the country, they are not keen to talk.

“We don’t talk to journalists,” a spokesman there told Reuters by telephone. “It wouldn’t help our business.”

They are, however, looking for new recruits.

Under the vacancies section of their Web site, the detective service is on the look-out for “confident, bubbly, outgoing men and women with an ability to think on their feet.”

Becoming a honey trapper demands reliability, honesty and accuracy, it says, and because most of the trapping takes place outside office hours, it can offer “an ideal second career.”

(Editing by Luke Baker)

Studies say physicians are being influenced by drug companies and others

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008

From the Tennessean Newspaper

Studies say physicians are being influenced drug

By STEVEN G. GABBE, M.D. • February 18, 2008

At 8 a.m. on Aug. 8, 2007, during their very first week of medical school, Vanderbilt medical students heard a lecture from Dr. Ellen Wright Clayton, professor of law and pediatrics, about potential conflicts of interest faced by practicing physicians, including those related to pharmaceutical and medical device companies.As the students left the lecture hall, they passed by tables of bagels, juice and coffee set up for another lecture next door where the audience of faculty physicians and residents listened to a noted expert on heart disease review the latest research on a new treatment.
Advertisement

These types of lectures, commonly known as grand rounds, represent a tradition of how physicians at academic medical centers like Vanderbilt stay up to date on the very latest medical discoveries and their application to patient care.

However, students noticed that, at the end of the breakfast table was a display of pens, notepads and pamphlets all prominently bearing the name of a new and highly effective drug brought to the market by a pharmaceutical company whose representative was sitting behind this table.

During their first week of medical school, these students faced their very first professional dilemma: Does the presence of marketing materials and the offer of a free meal by a pharmaceutical company representative create a potential conflict of interest for physicians in the care of their patients because they may be more likely to prescribe a specific drug as a result of this exposure?
Prescribing behavior is affected

Many physicians believe their level of professionalism and integrity would not allow such a small token to influence their medical judgment. Recent studies, however, have shown that the prescribing behavior of physicians may be more highly influenced by meals and gifts than physicians often realize. These studies are consistent with years of marketing research that show how all of us are affected by product advertising.

That’s why many medical centers, including Vanderbilt, have for years had some level of restriction on the value of gifts and meals that companies could provide physicians and employees.

However, as recently reported in The Tennessean, Vanderbilt University Medical Center has joined a growing number of academic medical centers across the country by establishing a policy that no physician, staff member or trainee shall accept a personal gift or meal from an industry representative regardless of the value of the gift. This new policy is based upon the understanding that physicians and other health-care providers have a special obligation to their patients to make medical decisions based solely upon the best scientific evidence available.

These decisions should not be compromised by even the slightest appearance of any conflict by industry marketing practices. If we are going to teach medical students, beginning in their first week of medical school, about their obligations as a professional, we must make sure their teachers are modeling the behavior we are teaching. It’s the right thing to do for our students and our patients.

Steven G. Gabbe, M.D. is dean of the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.

found a new buy sell web site

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008

So I was doing a google image search for funny pics of Monica Lewinski and I stumbled upon a new web site – ioffer.com arkansas blowjob quarterthat does the whole online buy sell trade thing. I may have to get Sam to add this site to his new and upcoming post what you want site. I did find a funny parody fake Arkansas quarter with a behind the tree blowjob on it. Funny.

Steer clear of these 10 illegal job interview questions

Monday, February 11th, 2008

Wow! I found a cool web site with a ton of useful info. Can’t believe I hadn’t found this place yet…

The article that led me to this mecca: (from tech republic)
Steer clear of these 10 illegal job interview questions

* Date: September 17th, 2007
* Author: Suzanne Thornberry
Although HR departments should be aware of questions that are illegal to ask prospective employees, some hiring managers aren’t so savvy. Many illegal questions are easy for just about anyone with elementary social graces to avoid, but others might surprise you. In general, you should not ask interviewees about their age, race, national origin, marital or parental status, or disabilities.

Note that this list offers only some very broad guidelines and is not exhaustive. Check with your company’s HR department to see if your state or locality, or even your company, has additional restrictions on what you may ask.

Note: This information is also available as a PDF download.
#1: Where were you born?

This question might seem like small talk as you get to know a person, but it could also be used to gather information illegally about the candidate’s national origin. Although it may seem more relevant, you should also avoid asking, “Are you a U.S. citizen?” You can ask whether a candidate is authorized to work in the United States, but avoid asking about citizenship.
#2: What is your native language?

Again, the problem is that this question could be used to determine national origin. You can ask whether the person knows a language if it is required for the job. For example, if job responsibilities include supporting Spanish-speaking customers, it’s fair to ask whether the candidate speaks Spanish.
#3: Are you married?

Here’s another question that would seem innocent in most settings, but definitely not in a job interview. Because you can’t discriminate on the basis of marital status, this question is off limits.
#4: Do you have children?

This might sound like small talk, too – an innocent question in most settings – but not in a job interview. It’s covered by a general prohibition about discrimination over parental status.
#5: Do you plan to get pregnant?

In the past, employers sometimes asked this question to weed out women who might take a maternity leave. It has always been rude coming from a casual acquaintance, and now it’s illegal as well.
#6: How old are you?

Some companies used to avoid hiring older workers for a variety of reasons, ranging from a fear of higher healthcare costs and absences to a social bias in favor of youth. But age discrimination is clearly illegal, and you should avoid this question. Don’t try to get the information by asking when the person graduated from college, either.
#7: Do you observe Yom Kippur?

You can’t discriminate on the basis of religion, so this question is illegal, as would be asking about Good Friday, Ramadan, or the Solstice. If you’re concerned about the candidate’s availability, you could ask whether he or she can work on holidays and weekends, but not about the observance of particular religious holidays.
#8: Do you have a disability or chronic illness?

This information is not supposed to be used as a factor in hiring, so the questions are illegal. If the job will require some specific physical tasks, such as installing cables in walls and ceilings, you may ask whether the person could perform those tasks with reasonable accommodation.
#9: Are you in the National Guard?

Although some managers may find it disruptive when employees leave for duty, it’s illegal to discriminate against someone because he or she belongs to the National Guard or a reserve unit.
#10: Do you smoke or use alcohol?

In general, you can’t discriminate on the basis of the use of a legal product when the employee is not on the premises and not on the job.

Tip: To avoid asking the wrong questions, develop an interview form and use a copy of it for each candidate. It will document that you asked each interviewee the same questions. Failing to do so may establish a pattern that could seem discriminatory. For example, if you ask only women about their willingness to travel, thinking that the responsibilities of childcare would make them balk at business trips, you could establish a pattern of discrimination.