Archive for December, 2007

CASH music – a platform for digital distribution that makes fans into stake-holders

Thursday, December 13th, 2007

CASH music, a platform for Radiohead-style digital distribution that makes fans into stake-holders

Posted by Cory Doctorow, From Boing Boing November 27, 2007 9:59 PM
Chris sez, “One of my favorite songwriters, Kristin Hersh (Throwing Muses, 50FOOTWAVE, and solo) has founded the Coalition for Artists and Stake Holders, on the assumption that both artists and fans are stakeholders in the production of music. She’s built a framework to distribute music on the internet while taking donations (sort of Radiohead-style: pay what you want) and taking full advantage of the medium — including offering ProTools tem files via BitTorrent so you can remix her song!” Link

Sure would be nice to see more arrangements like these made where people share and get credit for sharing. It will be intersting to see where things go with business models like these.

Play office politics without getting dirty a few ideas

Friday, December 7th, 2007

from yahoo finance / Forbes

Fortune
Play office politics without getting dirty
Thursday November 29, 11:52 am ET
By Anne Fisher, Fortune senior writer

Look up “politics” at websters.com and you’ll find a secondary entry, “play politics,” defined thus: “to deal with people in an opportunistic, manipulative, or devious way, as for job advancement.” I’d guess that’s the way most of us think of office politics.

But Mitchell Kusy, Ph.D., a Fulbright scholar for international organizational development who teaches in the doctoral program at Antioch University, has a different idea. Co-author of a new book called Manager’s Desktop Consultant: Just-in-Time Solutions to the Top People Problems That Keep You Up at Night (Davies-Black, $18.95), Kusy sees politics as “the art of building relationships that will help you and your team accomplish more than you could on your own.”

“Playing politics the right way can have a tremendous impact on your career,” he says. “It’s a matter of learning good gamesmanship.”

I talked recently with Kusy about how to play politics at work in a positive way. Some excerpts from our conversation:

Q. In your consulting work, do you often find that “politics” has gotten a bad name?

A. Oh, definitely. But you can’t escape it. Every organization is political. You can’t just say, “I won’t get involved in office politics,” because that simply won’t work, especially if you hope to get to a position of power or influence. So what we try to do is, teach people how to engage with the political structure of the company in a positive way.

Q. How does one do that?

A. The first step is to figure out how success is measured in your organization. This might sound obvious, but when we poll people in companies, we find that they often don’t know exactly what makes someone successful – or not – whether it’s generating revenues, or delivering excellent customer service, or any number of things. But once you have analyzed what is really valued by the organization, you can start to align what you’re doing with that.

Then, take a good look at the prevailing management style. How does your style fit in? If the power brokers in the company all have a very autocratic style, and yours is more consensus-driven, or vice versa, try to adapt your style. But do it in small steps. Trying to suddenly act in a way that is totally out of character for you is likely to backfire.

Q. Besides how success is measured, what else do you find many people don’t know about their company’s power structure?

A. How much risk is tolerated, and what happens if you try something new and fail. This is crucial, yet many people don’t take it into account ahead of time. Let’s say you work for an entrepreneurial organization where people are expected to make decisions quickly and rely a great deal on their intuition. If you’re a very analytical person who has to dot every “i” and cross every “t” before you can reach a decision, you’ll probably miss the boat. And the reverse is true as well. If you want to achieve influence in the organization, you have to be operating on the same wavelength as the people who have power.

You also need to know what the consequences will be if you take a risk and it doesn’t work out. Will you get a slap on the wrist, or be ostracized for a while and then forgiven, or will you be fired? If it’s the latter, you might decide to take a calculated risk anyway, but you won’t be blindsided by the result.

Q. What’s the most common mistake people make in trying to increase their own influence?

A. One very common mistake is, aligning themselves too closely with any one group or faction – which has the effect of needlessly alienating other factions. Try to find a variety of benefits in a wide range of alliances. One sure way to build your influence is to learn how to work with your opponents and find areas of mutual interest and agreement. In my consulting practice, I’ve seen people really try to understand an “enemy’s” position, and end up changing their own views as a result. That’s very powerful. It shows that you’re confident enough to be flexible.

Q. What if you do all these things – analyze what the organization defines as “success,” adapt your style to the prevailing style, understand the risk tolerance, and so on – and you decide you’re in the wrong place? Does that happen much?

A. Yes, and at that point I’ve seen people leave one organization and go to another one where they have a better chance of achieving real influence without having to change their entire personality. As a psychologist I can tell you, everyone can adapt to some extent, but people’s essential personalities do not change.

So if you find yourself in a situation where you are struggling to connect to the power structure and build influence, but you just don’t fit in well enough – especially if what is expected is an affront to your sense of integrity – maybe you don’t belong there.

You have to be authentic. The cardinal rule of good politics is: If it isn’t really you, don’t do it.

Readers, what do you think? Can office politics ever be positive? Or have you only seen the negative effects? What are the best and worst examples of office politics you’ve seen? Post your thoughts on the Ask Annie blog.

Google Voluntarily Provides Details Of Anonymous Blogger In Israel

Thursday, December 6th, 2007

Google Voluntarily Provides Details Of Anonymous Blogger In Israel

Article from Techcrunch

Duncan Riley

Google has provided the IP address of an anonymous blogger to an Israeli court voluntarily as part of a defamation case.

The defamation case centers on allegations against three members of the Shaarei Tikva council posted on Blogger, including posts that suggested the council members took bribes, pretended to be disabled to gain tax advantages, and that the councilmen have links to organized crime. The councilmen asked the court to order Google to hand over the IP address details of the anonymous blogger but the court did not order Google to do so. Instead Google entered into an arrangement where by they would contact the blogger and give him or her 3 days to respond anonymously to the allegations. There was no response from the blogger so Google handed over the IP address to the court and plantiffs despite there being no legal requirement for them to do so.

Privacy remains a heated issue online, and the case has some resemblance to the now infamous Yahoo/ China case. What’s different in this case is that where as Yahoo was presented with a legal demand for information on an anonymous user, Google has voluntarily provided this information in Israel.

According to Globes Online, Google had initially said that “disclosing the blogger’s identity violated rulings on the balance between freedom of expression and a person’s right to his reputation,” so what changed? This is the same company that refused to comply with US Government requests for information in 2005, a company that prides itself on privacy and its “Do No Evil” mantra. Perhaps the moral of the story: trust no one on privacy, even Google.

This adds to the debate about google and other internet portals having issues about privacy. Internet users often do not know about all of the information that can be collected when surfing and posting online, and often do not find out until an issue like this arises. I have heard that there may be legislation to alert internet surfers about marketing data that is collected and shared, but other issues like this should also be at the forefront.